Transcript for Piscataway Zoning meeting on September 8 2022
Note: Transcripts are generated by rev.ai and may not be fully accurate. Please listen to the recording (below) if you feel any text is inaccurate.
Speaker 0 00:00:01 Okay. Chairman seven 30, Speaker 2 00:00:07 The zoning board of adjustment meeting will please come to order. Adequate notice of this meeting was provided in the following ways. Notice published in the courier news notice posted on the bulletin board of the municipal building notice made available to the town Township clerk notice sent to the courier news and the star ledger will the clerk. Please call the role Speaker 0 00:00:26 Mr. Weisman Speaker 2 00:00:27 Here. Speaker 0 00:00:27 Mr. Tillery here, Mr. Patel here, Mr. Reggio is coming on you as having issues. Mr. Dacey. Mr. Hay DACA Speaker 2 00:00:39 Here. Speaker 0 00:00:40 Mr. Mitterando here. Mr. Ali, sick. You will not be joining us and Chairman Cahill Speaker 2 00:00:46 Here, will everyone please stand in a symbolic Salude to the flag Speaker 3 00:00:52 Allegiance to Liberty. Speaker 2 00:01:05 I will say that this time by the next meeting we have, we will have a, I salute my flag out on the front lawn here. I know most of you don't have a flag in your, in your presence, so we'll be providing a flag for you to salute moving forward. Mr. Kinneally any changes to the agenda? Speaker 4 00:01:24 Yes. There are a couple of changes. The application of Michael Coel six court is adjourned until September 22nd, 2022. Laura. It's correct that there's no further notice of the joint property owners, but they're gonna have to publish. Speaker 0 00:01:39 Yes, the courier news. Didn't get back to them. Speaker 4 00:01:42 Okay. So that, that will be off until September 22nd. The application of Anton and Naisha LER is also adjourn until September 22nd. And that's the same issue I believe Speaker 0 00:01:52 Correct? Yes. They actually put wrong Speaker 4 00:01:54 Notice to the adjoining property owners. They just have to publish in the paper. Speaker 2 00:01:57 Got it. Correct. Speaker 4 00:01:58 Those total changes that I have. Speaker 2 00:02:00 Thank you, sir. Let's move forward to item number 5 22 dash ZB 56. Jim Moser Speaker 4 00:02:07 Is Mr. Moser present? Yes. Mr. Moer, I need to swear you in. Could you raise your right hand? You swear the testimony you're about to give should be the truth. Speaker 5 00:02:15 I do. Speaker 4 00:02:16 Thank you. Could you explain to the board you're here? Speaker 5 00:02:18 I'm asking for variances to retain the exist existing shed on my property. Speaker 4 00:02:26 Okay, Mr. Chairman, if you notice it's a 75 foot front setback for an accessory structure and he's got 59 feet. So he's got a significant setback already. And I believe Mr. Hinterstein has no issues with this. Speaker 2 00:02:36 Is Henry available? Is he a Speaker 0 00:02:39 He's here? Speaker 2 00:02:40 Oh, no comment, Henry. Speaker 0 00:02:43 Just Speaker 2 00:02:43 For the record. Speaker 6 00:02:44 No, no comments it state in the report. Although it's a front yard setback variance. It's a corner property with two front yards and setback, quite a substantial amount. I think it's almost even with the existing house and much further back than the adjacent properties. The other side of the pipeline. Speaker 2 00:03:03 All right, Henry. Thank you. Any other members of the board have any questions about this application? Hearing none. I'm gonna open it to the public. Anyone in the public have any questions or comments about this application? Speaker 0 00:03:16 No one Chairman. Speaker 2 00:03:17 Okay. Hearing none. I'm gonna close it to the public portion and I'm gonna make a motion to approve this application. Can I get a second? Thank you. Hey. Speaker 0 00:03:29 Oh, thank you, Mr. Weisman. Yes. Mr. Tillery? Speaker 2 00:03:35 Yes. Speaker 0 00:03:36 Mr. Patel? Speaker 2 00:03:38 Yes Speaker 0 00:03:39 MRIO. Speaker 2 00:03:44 Yes. Speaker 0 00:03:45 Thank you, Mr. Haka. Speaker 2 00:03:47 Yes. Speaker 0 00:03:48 Mr. Mitterando. Speaker 2 00:03:49 Yes. Speaker 0 00:03:50 And Chairman Cahill. Speaker 2 00:03:51 Yes. Speaker 4 00:03:52 Mr. Moer, your application's been approved. We will memorialize it in a written document at our next meeting. You don't need to be present for that. We'll send that document to you. Speaker 2 00:04:00 Thank you very much. Thank you, sir. Have a good evening. You too. Let's go to item number 6 21, ZB 81 V aithal Perza Speaker 4 00:04:10 Is Mr. Perza present. Do you see Mr. Perza? Speaker 0 00:04:17 Oh, I hope he's here. I've been dealing with him for six months trying to get him on. I do not see him. Maybe we should go to the next application. Speaker 2 00:04:27 Let's skip this and double back. Speaker 4 00:04:29 We'll come back. Speaker 2 00:04:31 Let's go to item number 7 22 dash ZB dash 51 V Mina, Las Speaker 4 00:04:37 Amina. Las present. Speaker 7 00:04:40 Yes, I am. Good evening. Speaker 2 00:04:41 Good evening. Speaker 4 00:04:42 I you in, could you raise your right? The testimony you're about to give should be the truth. Speaker 7 00:04:49 Yes. Speaker 4 00:04:50 Okay. Your name and address please. Speaker 7 00:04:53 Meaner 200 Oak place. Piscataway New Jersey. Speaker 4 00:04:57 Thank you. Could you explain to the board what you'd like to do here? Speaker 7 00:05:01 I, I file for a variance to keep my existing fence gazebo and deck. I bought the house back in January. The fence has been there for over 15 years. We live right across from an industrial warehouse where there are really large trucks that park alongside the street on second. And there's a lot of traffic in and out and a lot of noise. So I would like to keep my fence deck in gazebo existing. Speaker 2 00:05:33 Mr. Hinterstein you had some comments on this. Speaker 6 00:05:37 Yeah. This case, like most of the cases where we have that are close to the right of way, line corner properties is a unique situation. Since as stated across the street, there's a large industrial complex that does generate a lot of noise and truck traffic. So, which I know it's not the norm, but in this particular case, I don't see any, any really harm keeping the fence in its current location. That's been there over 15 years, especially under the circumstances. And as far as the gazebo and the decks in line with the existing house. So I don't have any issues with the, with the setback variance on the guide yard for those items. Speaker 2 00:06:24 Thank you, sir. I appreciate it. Any other members of the board have any questions for this applicant or this application hearing none. I'm gonna open it to the public. Anyone in the public have any questions or comments about this application? Buckley Speaker 4 00:06:43 You're muted. Speaker 0 00:06:44 No one Chairman. Yeah. I was trying to my mouth. Speaker 2 00:06:46 Sorry. That's okay. Don't worry. That being said, I'm gonna close the public portion and at this point I'll make a motion to approve this application. Thank you so much. Please call roll. Speaker 0 00:06:59 Mr. Weisman. Yes. Mr. Tillery. Yes. Mr. Patel. Yes. MRIO. Yes. Mr. Hidaka. Yes. Mr. Mitterando. Yes. And Chairman Cahill. Speaker 2 00:07:11 Yes. Speaker 4 00:07:12 Ms. Las, your application has been approved. We will prepare a written document to memorialize this and we'll adopt that at the next meeting. You don't need to be present for that, but we'll mail that document to you. Speaker 7 00:07:23 Thank you so much, Mr. Chairman. Thank you also miss Buckley. I Speaker 0 00:07:26 Appreciate your note. You're very welcome. Have a good night, Speaker 2 00:07:28 Have a great night. Ma'am Speaker 0 00:07:29 You as well. Thank Speaker 2 00:07:31 You. Let's move along to item number 8 22 dash ZB dash 59 V. John Fritz Speaker 4 00:07:36 Is John Fritz present. Speaker 2 00:07:39 I think you're muted. Mr. Fritz. There you go. Yeah. Speaker 8 00:07:42 Yeah. We're here. Speaker 4 00:07:44 Are you both gonna be testifying? Speaker 8 00:07:46 Yes. Speaker 4 00:07:47 I need to swear both of you in, could you each raise your right hand? Swear the testimony you're about to give should be the truth. Speaker 8 00:07:54 Yes. Yep. Speaker 4 00:07:55 Put your hands down and one at a time. Give your name and address please. Speaker 8 00:07:59 I'm Fritz 1 0 4 Curtis avenue in Piscataway and John Fritz. 1 0 4 Curtis avenue in Piscataway. Speaker 4 00:08:07 Thank you. Cause one of you explained to the board what you'd like to do here. Speaker 8 00:08:12 Well, we had an existing shed on the property already, but we got married last year. And when I moved in the house was a little bit small for four people. So I went and started building another shed. We found out that we needed to get a permit for it. We failed the permit. So I'm filing for variance to keep the, the shed that I already started building the new shed in the existing, in the existing spot. Any existing shed in the spots that they are in currently. So we're filing Speaker 4 00:08:53 For Mr. Chairman. You may wanna check Speaker 2 00:08:54 With Henderson. Yeah, Henry, I, I saw a couple of comments on this. I was wondering if you could please address this. Speaker 6 00:09:02 Yeah, obviously the required a variance were an existing, smaller shed. It was only slightly deviating from the setback back requirement. And I don't really have a problem with the small shed. It's about a foot, less than what it's supposed to be to the side yard, but there is a solid fence and it's provided screen. But the problem is, is the 12 by 20 structured out was started without permits with this aframe roof. I mean, it's, it's, it's really, really close to the, I don't know what the actual variance was, but it's required to be eight feet and this is not a hundred foot Chadwick. This is a 240 square foot accessory structure. It's rather large. And even though I'm empathetic to the fact that he had started this project, perhaps he didn't know he needed a permit, regardless, the requirement is eight feet. So I, I look at the property. Speaker 6 00:10:05 I don't see any reason why that Chadwick cannot be located in a conforming location as big backyard, as many areas where that Chadwick could have been put in, in a location that would conform with the ordinance, the, or ordinances are there to protect the neighbors. And in this particular case, I just don't see really a hardship allowing that shed to remain. I, I believe it's less than a, less than two feet from the property line, the aframe roof across the water, right on the property line. And again, the ordinances such that, you know, it's supposed to be eight feet from that side property line. You know, there could be perhaps a little bit of, you know, negotiation there as far as a compromise, but really, I, I can't see that larger of an structure being, you know, closer to property line that maybe really, Speaker 9 00:11:12 So I'm sorry, Mr. Hinterstein, Speaker 6 00:11:14 You're cutting in and out. Any reason why it couldn't have Cahn and if they wouldn't Henry, your Internet's going and out be my connection Speaker 2 00:11:24 Henry. You, yeah, you're locked in and out for a second. If you could just repeat that last 30 seconds worth of com. Speaker 6 00:11:30 Yeah. I mean basically, I mean, if the permit would've been secured, then they would've known that the, the check was posted being location other than where they put it, Speaker 2 00:11:45 What would be a compromise in terms of how far from where is Speaker 6 00:11:47 Now? He said I'm to that fact, but I can't. Yeah, I can't envision it being closer than five feet to the neighboring property line that Speaker 9 00:12:00 Well, to address your question is why the shed was put there. The shed was put there to be exactly in line with the depth, with the existing shed. And although the property size wise, we could pull the shed in it honestly would really look stupid coming in, in front of the other shed. The other shed is tucked into the corner and this shed was built to align exactly it's the exact same depth of the other shed. So that it's one smooth look to, to the sheds. And it is, I, we do understand that we did need to get the, the permit. We just tried to build it exactly the same as the other shed, using the same materials, the same structure. We did read your notes. And we understand that drainage is an issue that you were concerned about the rain runoff. And we thought that perhaps by adding gutters on that far side, that's close to the shed and pulling the rain runoff to the front where it wouldn't impact our neighbors. We did understand that we were building this shed right next to, we have talked to all our neighbors prior to building, and everybody was very happy to see us be able to build it. So we're not really sure if you could take into consideration the aesthetic of it without pulling that shed in and the option for gutters to deal with the rain runoff. Speaker 6 00:13:34 The answer to that is lining it up with the other shed that was probably put in illegally again, wasn't, you know, justify where you located it. Doesn't justify not pulling a permit for this shed, but Speaker 9 00:13:46 Not by us. We didn't, we fully, Speaker 6 00:13:49 I understand. I understand. But again, if you pull the permit, you would've been told your other shed doesn't comply. You would've been told this shed has to be in a certain location and you wouldn't be in the situation that you're in. Now, the ordinance are established again for a reason. And although your neighbor right now may not have a problem with that shed being foot and a half off property line, next owner of that property may have issue with, again, your answers are there for reason. Unfortunately, what you may think looks stupid. That's not, you know, attending justification or looks silly. I forget the word that was used, but you know, other doesn't look right. You know, planning, justification to, you know, put it closer than what the ordinance requires. Yes. You could press a gutter on the fact that you have 240 square foot accessory structure, property line, where eight feets required. Speaker 6 00:14:55 Again, you have a large property. I'm not saying that it had to be in that particular spot, but it should have been in a conforming location, whether it be in the other corner of the property, flip flop with the other shed. Again, I, I can't tell you where to put it now. You know, I can only tell you what's conforming. I'm not there to design it for you. And you know, maybe you need to screen it, put it in a location that, or maybe move the other shed. So they look again that they're in a similar location, the way they are now in a conforming location. And like I said, I'm empathetic that the fact that you're gonna have to, you know, pay the cost of moving this shed or to structure. But again, I don't think that the cost is a, again, another reason to justify the vari it's when the permit wasn't secured in the first place, I'll let you can elaborate perhaps more on, on that. Speaker 4 00:15:57 So what Henry is saying is your idea to put the shed along the same line as the other shed may have seemed, seemed attractive to you. But the size of the new shed requires an even greater setback. It can't be two feet. The small shed should not be two feet, but we're willing to overlook that since it's only a foot or so over, this is six feet over. So I think you're gonna have to think about relocating that shed farther off the property line. And if you don't want to go eight feet, if you wanna offer some kind of a compromise, the board is certainly willing to discuss that. Speaker 9 00:16:38 I feel like you said five feet would be acceptable. Is that what you're saying from the property line? Speaker 6 00:16:43 I think that's a reasonable compromise. Speaker 9 00:16:46 OK. Speaker 2 00:16:47 Is that something you guys would be interested in based on what I think it's a good compromise, to be honest with you situation Speaker 9 00:16:56 There's, you're not really giving us an option. So it's, it's what is what its, Speaker 2 00:17:02 We could deny the application in general. Speaker 9 00:17:06 We understand that, but like that it's that or so yes it's, Speaker 6 00:17:15 Kinneally Speaker 8 00:17:16 It's two feet. So Speaker 6 00:17:18 Gotta understand is you have a large property and there has to be a hardship of why it can't be put in a conforming location. I just don't see that hardship. I believe the five feet is I think more than reasonable, far as to the location. Not so that it doesn't impact the neighboring Speaker 2 00:17:40 Henry Henry. Do any other member of the board of any questions or comments. Okay. Anyone in the public portion have any questions or comments about this? Suffocation? Buckley? Speaker 0 00:17:56 No Chairman Speaker 2 00:17:57 None. Okay. Close the public portion instance. I'm gonna say that. I think the five foot compromise is something that the Township is willing to, to extend, you know, based on the options that we're offered as a government and based on what you have already structured. So if you're willing to do that, I'm willing to put forth a approval of this application. Okay. Thank you. I'm not gonna do without your approval. Okay. We'll go. We'll go with that. My feed. Okay, good. At this point I'd like to offer a, an applica, if this application be approved. Can I get a second? Second? Speaker 0 00:18:37 Thank you. Call Speaker 2 00:18:39 The role please. Speaker 0 00:18:40 Mr. Weisman. Yes. Mr. Tillery. Speaker 2 00:18:43 Yes. Speaker 0 00:18:44 Mr. Patel. Yes. Mr. Rio. Yes. Mr. Dacey has joined us. Mr. Dacey. Speaker 2 00:18:50 Yes. Speaker 0 00:18:51 Mr. Hey DACA. Speaker 2 00:18:52 Yes. Speaker 0 00:18:53 And Chairman Cahill. Speaker 2 00:18:55 Yes. Speaker 4 00:18:57 Your application as amended has been approved for a five foot setback. We will memorialize this in our next meeting. You don't need to be here. We'll mail that document to you, but you'll need that to get your permits. Speaker 0 00:19:09 Okay. Speaker 10 00:19:09 Thank Speaker 2 00:19:10 You guys. Thank you. Let's move along to item number 9 22. CB Ram Speaker 4 00:19:20 Is Ram present. Speaker 10 00:19:22 Yes we Speaker 4 00:19:25 Testifying tonight Speaker 10 00:19:27 Wife. Yes. My husband Speaker 4 00:19:31 Swear testimony. You're about give, should be the truth. Speaker 10 00:19:34 Yes. Nothing but the truth. Yes. Speaker 11 00:19:36 Put Speaker 4 00:19:37 Your hands down one at a time. Give us your names please. Speaker 10 00:19:39 Okay. My name is Sanita live at 1422 Greenwood drive Piscataway. Speaker 11 00:19:46 My name is not Ramish because I already request you see I'm in the application. Speaker 4 00:19:54 Okay. And could one of you explain to the board what you'd like to do here? Speaker 10 00:19:58 We would like to put a fence on one side, we did notify the Township. There was a theft in our neighborhood. One of the guy came and stole the ladder and we were able to give that footage to the Piscataway police department. They came and it happened two o'clock in the morning. A young guy came on the bike, stole the stole the, I think how big, the big ladder 20 feet ladder. And after that we were quite scared and we wanted to put the fence to secure our property. Speaker 4 00:20:28 Okay. And, and you understand that this fence is gonna be located partially within an easement, Speaker 10 00:20:32 Correct? Yes. Speaker 4 00:20:33 And if the Township ever needs access to that easement, you would be responsible for removing the fence and replacing it at your own cost, correct? Speaker 10 00:20:40 Yes. Speaker 4 00:20:40 Thank you. That's all I have Mr. Chairman. Speaker 2 00:20:43 Yes. I don't feel any need to go to Mr. Hinterstein at this point, based on the information you just provided to our Township attorney, any other questions from any other members of the board for this applicant hearing none. I'm gonna ask that the public portion be open anybody at the public portion. Have any questions for this applicant? Speaker 0 00:21:04 No Chairman. Speaker 2 00:21:05 Okay. Close the public portion. I'll make a motion to approve this application. Gotta get a second. I'll say a second. Thank you. Please call the roll. Speaker 0 00:21:14 Mr. Weisman. Yes. Mr. Tillery. Yes. Mr. Patel. Yes. Mr. Raio. Yes. Mr. Dacey. Speaker 12 00:21:23 Yes. Speaker 0 00:21:24 Mr. Haka. Yes. And Chairman Cahill. Yes. Speaker 2 00:21:28 Your Speaker 4 00:21:28 Application who's been approved. We will memorialize this in a written document at our next meeting. You don't need to be present for that. We'll mail that document to you cuz you'll need that to get your permits. Speaker 10 00:21:37 Yeah. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Thank you. Rest of the team and also miss Laura as well. Thank Speaker 0 00:21:42 You. Thank Speaker 2 00:21:43 You. Have a great evening. Now you Speaker 12 00:21:44 Too. Thank you. Speaker 2 00:21:45 Okay, we're gonna move along to item number 10 22 dash CB dash 57. Date Patel Speaker 4 00:21:52 Is viron Patel present. Speaker 12 00:21:55 Yes. Speaker 4 00:21:57 I need to swear you in. Could you raise your right hand? You swear that testimony you're about to give should be the truth. Speaker 12 00:22:03 Yes. Yes. Speaker 4 00:22:05 Your name and address please. Speaker 12 00:22:06 Yeah. My name is Patel. Speaker 0 00:22:09 Mr. Patel, you have two things on in the house Speaker 2 00:22:12 Getting Speaker 0 00:22:13 Feedback, feedback, Patel that echoing one of the volume has to get shut off. I don't know if you're on your phone end, a computer or two computers. One has to get shut off or lowered. Speaker 12 00:22:23 No, I, I just, Speaker 4 00:22:26 Okay. Mr. Patel, could you explain to the board what you'd like to do here? Speaker 12 00:22:31 So recently I, I apply for, for fans and the permit got denied for one of the side and they suggest me to go with the waiver variance. I want to secure my property as I have a older parents and a young child, and recently our theft with my neighbor. So just want to secure my property. Speaker 4 00:22:58 And, and you understand that the fence is located partially within an easement? Speaker 12 00:23:02 Yes, I do understand. Speaker 4 00:23:03 And if the Township ever needs access to that easement, you would be responsible for removing that fence and replacing it at your own cost. Speaker 12 00:23:10 Yes, that's right. Speaker 4 00:23:11 Mr. Chairman, I don't have any further comments. Speaker 2 00:23:13 Understood. And, and like the, the previous application, I feel no need to get Mr. Interesting involved, because it is cut and dry. Any other members of the board of any questions Mr. Patel, this application hearing none. I'm gonna open it to the public. Anyone in the public portion have any questions or comments about this application? Speaker 0 00:23:35 No one Chairman. Speaker 2 00:23:36 Okay. Ms. Buckley. I'm gonna close the public portion and I'm gonna make a motion to approve this application for Mr. Patel. Can I get a second? I second. Thank you so much, Ms. Buckley called the roles Speaker 0 00:23:48 Mr. Weisman. Yes. Mr. Tillery? Yes. Mr. Patel? Yes. MRIO. Yes. Mr. Dacey. Yes. Mr. Haka. Yes. And Chairman Cahill. Yes. Speaker 4 00:24:01 Mr. Patel, your application has been approved. We will memorialize it in a written document at our next meeting. You don't need to be present for that. We'll mail a document to you and you'll need that to get your permits. Speaker 2 00:24:11 Thank you so much, huh? Good luck a great night now. Thank you. Thanks. Let's move along to item number 1322 dash ZB dash 67 V. Richard Jones and Cynthia mango Jones. Speaker 4 00:24:28 Are the Jones present? Speaker 13 00:24:31 Yes. Speaker 4 00:24:34 Are you tonight, Mr. Speaker 2 00:24:40 Will you testifying? Yes. Speaker 4 00:24:43 To swear both of you in, could you each, you T should be the testimony you're about to give, should be the truth. One at a time address please. Speaker 13 00:24:53 Richard Jones, 180 6 brew. Speaker 0 00:24:56 Cynthia Magno Jones, 180 6 Brewster Speaker 13 00:24:59 Avenue. Speaker 4 00:24:59 Thank Speaker 13 00:25:02 You're seeking to and shed on the property Speaker 4 00:25:09 Over, over at easement. Speaker 13 00:25:10 Yes. Speaker 4 00:25:11 And if the Township ever needs access to that easement, you understand that it's your responsibility to remove and replace that fence of your own expense. Speaker 13 00:25:18 Yes. Speaker 4 00:25:19 Thank you. That's all I have. Mr. Chairman Speaker 2 00:25:21 Understood Mr. Cahn. Thank you. And again, as to the prior to applications, I'm not gonna get Mr. Hinterstein involved because this is pretty much cut and dry. Any other members of the board have any questions for Mr and Mr. Jones or about this application hearing none. I'm gonna open it to the public. Anyone in the public have any questions or comments about this application? Speaker 0 00:25:44 No one Chairman. Speaker 2 00:25:45 Okay. Close the public portion and I'd make a motion to approve this application. I'd like a second. Okay. All the world please. I'll second it, thank you, Speaker 0 00:25:55 Mr. Weisman. Yes. Mr. Tillery? Speaker 13 00:25:59 Yes. Speaker 0 00:25:59 Mr. Patel? Yes. Mr. Regio? Speaker 2 00:26:02 Yes. Speaker 0 00:26:03 Mr. Dacey. Yes. Mr. Haka? Yes. And Chairman Cahill. Yes. Speaker 4 00:26:09 Your application has been approved. We will memorialize this in a written document at our next meeting. You don't need to be present for that. We'll mail that document to you, but you'll need that for your permit. Speaker 13 00:26:19 Thank you very much. Thank you everyone. Speaker 4 00:26:20 Thank you. Have a good Speaker 2 00:26:21 Night. Have a good night guys. You Speaker 13 00:26:23 Too. Speaker 2 00:26:23 Okay. Let's move along to item number 1422 ZB 14 V. And I am about to murder this name, MEK and many Veja. Sancar how do I do? Speaker 0 00:26:37 Very good. Speaker 2 00:26:41 Good. I'm glad. Speaker 4 00:26:45 Are you gonna be testifying tonight? Yes. Okay. I need to swear also my take your testimony. First. Could you raise your, the testimony, be the truth? I your and address please? Yeah. 19 Saratoga, New Jersey. Thank you. And could you explain, you'd like to, yeah. It's first floor edition for a sun, a second floor edition and extension of the port. Okay. Mr. Chairman, you may wanna discuss this with Mr. Hinterstein with regard to his comment about relocating the shed. Yes, I do. Mr. Hinterstein please address your site impact you muted Henry Speaker 6 00:27:47 The 19 Saratoga court, correct? Speaker 4 00:27:49 That's correct. We're we're talking about the shed location. Speaker 6 00:27:53 Yeah, the, that location actually wasn't accurately dependent on the survey and I believe that Mr. Waqar drew it on his plan, but the looking at the, the aerial, unless it's been relocated, the shed itself is actually skewed. So although the one corner of the shed is relatively close to the property line, the way it's situated and skewed as the, as you go away from that corner, it starts to veer away from the property line. I, I spoke with Mr. Clark in about that earlier today, really? In cases like that, where just a corner touching it. I, I, the fact that there's an existing, again, this is similar. The other case in the sense that it's, it's only a regular size shed and there is a six foot solid fence that's buffering and screening the shed. So I don't have any issue with the shed. Really. Speaker 6 00:28:57 The only issue with this application, I believe was the, the new porch variance. All of the other variances are preexisting. There really isn't any impact on those preexisting variances. They've been there a while and the often reasonable, most of them were result of the development of the development as a, probably a cluster development at the time. It's really just a porch. There was talk about increasing the slab part of the porch and an optional railing. In my opinion, as long as there is no railing, then there's no issue with this application. Although the porch deviates from the front yard, step back, quite distance. If it's just the slab and there's no railing or anything above roof wise, there's really no impact and bare amenable to having no railing and cover over it. Then I really don't see any impact from the variance. And I think we can look upon it favorably. Speaker 2 00:30:01 Okay. Speaker 4 00:30:02 Mr. Chairman, you may want, we may want hear from his architect to address that Speaker 2 00:30:06 Issue. Jay, Mr. Waqar please. Speaker 4 00:30:08 Mr. Waqar are you present? Speaker 14 00:30:10 I Speaker 4 00:30:11 Good evening. I need to swear you in. You swear the testimony you're to give should be the truth Speaker 14 00:30:15 I do. Speaker 4 00:30:17 And please, Speaker 14 00:30:18 Gregory J Waqar a G a 2 1 0 9 St. George avenue. Rothway New Jersey. Oh 7 0 65. Speaker 4 00:30:27 And Mr. Waqar has been accepted by this board as an expert architect in prior cases. Speaker 14 00:30:31 Thank you, counsel. Yes, Speaker 2 00:30:33 Sir. Please proceed. Speaker 14 00:30:34 Yes. So, so basically that's what we're doing that we, we came in here with, for preexisting nonconforming situations as was alluded to earlier. And the extension of the front porch in essence is just the, the, the pad portion. We're not adding to the structure at all. And the railing was going to be placed there just as a, a barrier between a street. Again, our clients do have want the capability of a little bit of privacy, but I think we can probably converse with them and come up with an, a landscape alternative, as long as that's acceptable to Mr. Hinterstein, as opposed to offense, offense per se, or a railing is not required as we're not exceeding any building code Heights, which would require a fence or guardrail after four risers, we are virtually a slab on great entry and, and don't require it. It was more or less just a screen between between that particular seated portion, which is what lo can achieve. And the street we are on a cul-de-sac as you're well aware. And, and it was just for some privacy, but I think my clients will be more amenable towards a landscape barrier as opposed to a, a rail. Speaker 2 00:31:53 Is that okay with you Henry? Speaker 6 00:31:55 I think that's a great idea. Speaker 2 00:31:56 Awesome. Okay. Any other members of the board have any questions for this applicant hearing? None. I'm gonna open it to the public. Anyone in the public have any questions or comments about this application? Speaker 0 00:32:12 No one Chairman. Speaker 2 00:32:13 Okay. Close the public portion and I'd make a motion to approve this application with Henry's restrictions about no railing, Speaker 4 00:32:23 Make a motion. Speaker 2 00:32:25 I made a motion. Speaker 4 00:32:27 Hi, aithal second. Speaker 2 00:32:27 I great. Speaker 0 00:32:28 You already. Speaker 2 00:32:30 Thanks Raj. Goomer Mr. Buckley, Mr. Speaker 0 00:32:32 Mr. Weisman. Yes. Mr. Tillery. Yes. Mr. Patel. Yes. Dacey. Yes. Mr. Brown. Speaker 15 00:32:42 Yes. Speaker 0 00:32:42 Mr. Hey DACA. Speaker 4 00:32:43 Yes. Speaker 0 00:32:44 And Chairman Cahill. Speaker 2 00:32:45 Yes. Speaker 4 00:32:47 Mr. Sankar, your application has been approved as amended. Meaning there will be a condition that says that the slab can have no railing or cover. We will memorialize this at our next meeting in a written document and send a copy to you. You'll need that document to get your permits. Okay. Thanks. Speaker 2 00:33:04 Have a great night, gentlemen. Thanks everyone counselor say hello, Laura. Who did we back over? Za. Was it? Speaker 0 00:33:16 Yeah. Orlando. Perza Speaker 2 00:33:20 ISO Perza here. Speaker 0 00:33:23 He never showed up. I emailed him. He never showed. And you wanna put 'em on for, I I'll put 'em on the October meeting. I'm Speaker 2 00:33:31 Not doing put 'em on the October meeting. I don't want to pull the guy's legs out from under. Speaker 4 00:33:34 Okay. So anybody here on the aithal Perza application gonna be carried to what is the date of the October meeting? Speaker 0 00:33:40 October 13th, Speaker 4 00:33:41 October 13th with no further notice by the app. Speaker 2 00:33:47 That being said, let's move on to item number 15. The adoption of resolutions from the regular meeting of August 11th, 2022. Speaker 4 00:33:55 First resolution is Olay of tsunami, which you voted to improve Mr. Weisman? Yes. Mr. Tillery. Speaker 15 00:34:05 Yes. Speaker 4 00:34:05 Mr. O'Reggio. Yes. Mr. Blount. Speaker 15 00:34:09 Yes. Speaker 4 00:34:09 Mr. Haka. Yes. Mr. Mitterando. Speaker 15 00:34:12 Yes. Speaker 4 00:34:13 Second application was Jolyn which you voted partially to approve and partially to deny Mr. Weisman. Yes. Mr. Tillary. Speaker 15 00:34:23 Yes. Speaker 4 00:34:23 O'Reggio. Yes. Mr. Blount? Speaker 15 00:34:27 Yes. Speaker 4 00:34:28 AKA. Yes. Mr. Mitterando. Speaker 15 00:34:31 Yes. Speaker 4 00:34:32 Third application Brandy Patterson. This was an approval, Mr. Weisman. Yes. Mr. Tillery? Speaker 15 00:34:38 Yes. Speaker 4 00:34:39 MRIO yes. Mr. Dacey. Speaker 15 00:34:42 Yes. Speaker 4 00:34:44 Yes. Mr. Mitterando. Speaker 15 00:34:46 Yes. Speaker 4 00:34:47 Next application Craig Murk. This application was approved as amended. Mr. Weisman. Yes. Mr. Dacey. Speaker 15 00:34:54 Yes. Speaker 4 00:34:54 Mr. Dacey. Yes. Mr. Blount. Speaker 15 00:34:59 Yes. Speaker 4 00:35:01 Yes. Mr. Dacey Francis, which was approved. Mr. Wason. Yes. Mr. Tillery. Speaker 15 00:35:10 Yes. Speaker 4 00:35:11 MRIO yes. Mr. Blount. Speaker 15 00:35:14 Yes. Mr. Speaker 4 00:35:14 Dacey. Yes. Mr. Mitterando. Speaker 15 00:35:17 Yes. Speaker 4 00:35:18 Next is Jocelyn Galez. This application was approved. Mr. Weisman? Yes. Mr. Tillery? Speaker 15 00:35:24 Yes. Speaker 4 00:35:25 MRIO yes. Blount. Speaker 15 00:35:28 Yes. Hey, Speaker 4 00:35:29 Doing good. Yes. Speaker 15 00:35:32 Yes. Speaker 4 00:35:33 Alexander, this application was approved. Mr. Weisman? Yes. Mr. Tillary. Yes. MRIO. Yes. Mr. Blount. Yes. Yes. Mr. Dacey. Yes. Next, just wireless. This was an application to grant and exemption from site plan requirements. Mr. Weisman. Yes. Mr. Tillery. Yes. MRIO yes. Mr. Blount. Yes. Mr. Dacey. Yes. Mr. Mitterando. Yes. The last application for resolution is Osborn construction application was approved with conditions. Mr. Dacey. Yes. Mr. Tillery. Yes. MRIO yes. Blount. Yes. Mr. Dacey. Yes. Mr. Dacey. Yes. Those are all the resolutions I have this evening. Mr. Tim. Speaker 2 00:36:25 Thank you, Mr. Kaeley. Let's move on to item number 16, adoption of the minutes from the regular meeting of August 11th, 2022. All in favor, say, aye. Let's move on to item number 17. Adur I make a motion to adjourn all in favor, say aye. Okay. By the looks of the resolutions, you guys approved tonight, you were really busy back when I was on vacation. Thank you, Mr. Weisman for you're welcome. Taking my, taking up the, the mantle. And I'd like to always thank you for coming out and spending your time. That's your time representing the Township and I wish you all a great night and let's go Rutgers. Speaker 4 00:37:06 Goodnight, everyone.